Linear for Product Teams: Projects, Cycles, Workflows, Automations, and Analytics That Actually Ship

Por

Linear is loved because it feels fast and stays out of your way. But the real reason high-output teams swear by it is this: a small number of opinionated conventions—backed by labels, keyboard-first triage, and a few automations—turns Linear from “nice issue tracker” into a flow machine. This end-to-end playbook gives you a production-ready setup for small and medium product teams: teams and projects, issue types and states, cycles (sprints), triage and intake, automations, integrations, and a two-week rollout plan. Copy the structure; rename to taste.

Why Linear (and when it wins)

  • Speed and focus: zero-latency navigation and keyboard shortcuts mean you spend time thinking about the work, not the tool.
  • Just-enough structure: teams, projects, issues, and cycles map neatly to how cross-functional squads actually operate.
  • Great defaults, extensible: labels, templates, automations, and a solid API let you encode your operating model without wrestling with hundreds of fields.
  • Integrated delivery: PR links, Git automations, and project roadmaps tie strategy to commits.

Choose Linear when you want a light but disciplined product system. If you need heavy ITSM or strict change-management workflows, pair it with a service desk (JSM/Front) and sync only the dev-worthy items to Linear.

The minimal, scalable hierarchy

Create one workspace for your company. Inside it, define teams that mirror durable product surfaces or platforms (e.g., App, Platform, Growth, Data). Each team owns its backlog, cycles, and projects. Keep teams steady; create or archive projects as initiatives come and go.

Naming rules (copy these):

  • Teams: APP, PLAT, GROWTH, DATA.
  • Projects: Area — Initiative — Quarter (e.g., Billing — Usage-Based v2 — 2025Q4).
  • Issues: start with a verb + object and, when relevant, a component tag at the end (“Fix 3DS redirect loop — Checkout”).
  • Labels: a small, published set (details below).

Issue types, states, and labels

Types: Feature (default), Bug, Chore, and (optionally) Spike. Resist creating custom types for every nuance; labels do that job.

States (keep them short and universal across teams):

  • Backlog → Planned → In Progress → In Review → Done
  • Optional: Blocked (used as a state or a flag).
    Add Canceled for honest endings.

Labels (<= 20 across the whole workspace):

  • Priority: p0, p1, p2, p3
  • Risk/Compliance: security, privacy, legal
  • Surface/Component (if you don’t use Components): checkout, billing, onboarding
  • Kind: tech-debt, experiment, copy, infra
  • Release: flagged, backport, hotfix
  • Sources: from-support, from-sales, from-analytics

Publish a one-page “Label dictionary” with definitions and examples. If a label doesn’t drive a view, rule, or decision, delete it.

Templates that encode quality

Create three or four issue templates per team:

Feature

  • Problem
  • Success metric (how we’ll know)
  • Acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)
  • Design/spec links
  • Analytics/event plan
  • Rollout (flag, cohort, backout)

Bug

  • Severity (S1–S4)
  • Environment (browser/app/OS)
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected vs actual
  • Logs/screenshots
  • Regression? (Y/N) version

Spike

  • Hypothesis/questions
  • Timebox
  • Deliverable (doc, diagram, decision)

Chore

  • Rationale
  • Definition of done
  • Risk of deferring

Tie the Feature and Bug templates to required fields before an issue can move to In Review (enforced with an automation; details below).

Projects and roadmaps: outcomes above tickets

Linear projects are where strategy lives. Use them to group issues into outcomes that leadership and peers can track without wading through the backlog.

Project setup

  • Owner (single accountable person)
  • Target date and health (Green/Yellow/Red)
  • Milestones (2–5) with target weeks
  • Links to brief/designs/metrics dashboard
  • Views: Board by status, List grouped by milestone, Timeline

Ritual: update project health weekly with a one-sentence note. If a milestone slips, update the target date and the reason; this is your narrative for stakeholders.

Cycles (sprints) that actually create flow

Whether you run Scrum or lean Kanban, Linear’s cycles keep work small and moving.

  • Cadence: 1 or 2 weeks. Align across teams if you share dependencies.
  • Capacity: use a rolling average of completed points from the last three cycles; don’t over-promise.
  • WIP limits: no more than 2 items in In Progress per dev; enforce during stand-ups.
  • Definition of Ready to move from Backlog to Planned: AC written, designs linked, dependencies noted, estimate set, owner assigned.
  • Definition of Done to close: merged, deployed (or feature-flagged on for target cohort), analytics added, documentation updated.

During planning, pull from the project’s Issues list into the new cycle; never push half-baked tickets to “see what happens.”

Triage and intake: the 15-minute habit

Every day, one person plays triager for 10–15 minutes:

  1. Review new issues (from support, analytics, teammates).
  2. Apply p0–p3, correct type, and a component label; assign if obvious.
  3. If the report lacks AC or repro steps, comment with a template request and set to Backlog or Needs Spec.
  4. Link duplicates; close with a friendly note.
  5. Add high-value candidates to a “Now/Next/Later” view for PM+Eng to groom weekly.

This tiny ritual keeps the backlog fresh and prevents cycles from starting with mystery meat.

Automations that remove babysitting

Linear’s built-in automations and webhook/API open the door to a few high-leverage rules. Start with these:

  1. Quality gate to review
    • Trigger: Issue moves to In Review.
    • Condition: title does not contain a ticket ID format for design/spec, or description missing “Acceptance criteria”.
    • Action: add comment “Add AC and spec link before review,” move back to In Progress, mention assignee.
  2. SLA for high-severity bugs
    • Trigger: Label p0 or Bug severity S1 added.
    • Action: set due date = now + 24h, notify team channel (Slack), auto-assign to on-call, add label incident.
    • Secondary: if status not In Review by due-2h, escalate to manager.
  3. Auto-link PRs and transition
    • Trigger: PR opened with branch name containing issue ID.
    • Action: attach PR to issue; when PR moves to review, set status In Review; when merged, set Done (optionally Ready to Release if you ship via flag).
  4. Release notes collector
    • Trigger: Issue moved to Done with label changelog.
    • Action: append title + URL to a Notion/Docs page “Release YYYY-MM-DD” (via webhook/automation), grouped by project.
  5. Stale work nudge
    • Trigger: Issue in In Progress for > 3 days with no updates.
    • Action: add comment “What’s the blocker?” and label at-risk; surface in a “At Risk” view.

Name automations clearly and keep a short “Automation catalog” page with owners and last audit dates.

Git, CI/CD, and flags

  • Branch naming: team/1234-short-slug so PRs auto-attach to issues.
  • Checks: your CI status should post back to the issue; only allow merge when checks pass.
  • Feature flags: add a custom field Flag name; in Done criteria, specify “flag on for cohort X.” This makes rollback trivial and separates ship from exposure.

Analytics that drive decisions

Track a handful of metrics; discuss weekly:

  • Throughput: issues closed per cycle (trend stable or up).
  • Cycle time: In Progress → Done (aim to compress; spikes = inspect).
  • Lead time: Backlog → Done (shows prioritization + execution health).
  • WIP: items in In Progress per person (keep low).
  • Bug debt: open bugs over time and by severity (non-decreasing line ⇒ you’re paying quality tax).
  • Carryover: % of planned not completed per cycle (<20–30% healthy).

Create dashboard views per team: Now, At Risk, Bugs, Recently Done, and a Cycle report shared with leadership.

Integrations that reduce context switching

  • GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket: auto-attach PRs; transition on PR events; show checks.
  • Slack: post only high-signal events (new P0, issue to review, issue done for changelog); keep noisy logs in a #linear-logs channel.
  • Notion/Confluence: link briefs and decision docs to Projects; keep a Decision Log for traceability.
  • Sentry/Datadog: create issues for top error groups with a rule (severity and frequency thresholds).
  • Figma: paste file/section links; reviewers can jump straight in.

If you wouldn’t manually paste it weekly, you don’t need the integration.

Team rituals that make it stick

  • Weekly planning (45–60 min): review project status, pick cycle scope from Now/Next, confirm capacity, set owners.
  • Daily stand-up (10–15 min): walk the board top-to-bottom; unblock; enforce WIP limits.
  • Bug scrub (30 min/week): merge dups, stamp severities, schedule S1/S2s.
  • Demo hour (weekly): show the work; closes the loop between tickets and outcomes.
  • Retro (end of cycle): inspect metrics, pick one process experiment.

Security, privacy, and compliance

  • Use SSO and least-privilege roles (few admins).
  • Tag issues with security/privacy and restrict visibility or move to a private team if required.
  • Don’t paste secrets into descriptions; link to your vault or secure doc.
  • For regulated environments, mirror release notes and approvals in your change-management system and link back to Linear.

A two-week rollout plan

Days 1–2 — Decide the model
Define teams, states, labels, and naming rules. Write a one-pager “How we use Linear” (DoR/DoD, cycles, triage).

Days 3–4 — Create teams & projects
Set up teams (APP, PLAT, GROWTH, DATA). Create 2–4 live projects with owners, milestones, and target dates. Add the label dictionary.

Days 5–6 — Templates & automations v1
Build Feature/Bug/Spike templates. Ship automations for quality gate, P0/S1 SLA, PR linking, and stale work nudge. Test with a sandbox repo.

Day 7 — Integrations
Connect Git provider and Slack. Limit Slack to high-signal events. Link Notion/Confluence docs to projects.

Days 8–9 — Cycles
Start your first cycle with realistic capacity (moving average of last 3 weeks of throughput if available). Enforce DoR before Planned.

Day 10 — Views & dashboards
Create Now, At Risk, Bugs, Recently Done, and Cycle report views per team. Share a cross-team “Now board” for leadership.

Days 11–12 — Intake & triage
Stand up the 15-minute daily triage rotation. Build a “Now/Next/Later” view and a saved search for duplicates.

Days 13–14 — Retro & tune
Run a mini-retro after the first cycle. Adjust labels, WIP limits, and automation thresholds. Freeze the schema for a month to avoid churn.

Common pitfalls (and the fix)

  • Status soup: every team invents states. Fix: standardize on five; use labels for nuance.
  • Carrying half the cycle: planning to hope, not capacity. Fix: size honestly; cap WIP; cut scope mid-cycle when needed.
  • Backlog rot: thousands of stale tickets. Fix: triage daily; auto-close issues without updates after 90 days (reopen on comment); keep a “Later (Parked)” list but prune monthly.
  • No acceptance criteria: review becomes taste-based. Fix: templates + quality gate automation.
  • Noise in Slack: every status change posts. Fix: keep only p0, to review, and done (changelog); everything else in #linear-logs.
  • Unlinked PRs: tickets don’t prove code. Fix: branch naming convention + PR automation.

Final thoughts

Linear shines when you let it be boring in the right places—shared states, a tiny label set, strict DoR/DoD—and opinionated where it matters—project narratives, cycles with capacity, quality gates, and a handful of automations. Do that, and your board becomes a live picture of reality: what’s in motion, what’s blocked, what shipped, and how it connects to outcomes. Within two weeks, you’ll feel the shift from ticket shuffling to real flow—and leadership will stop asking for status meetings because the system tells the story for you.

Deixe um comentário